4.2 Review

Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 24-36

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC DENTAL MATERIALS DEVICES
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-172

Keywords

Zirconia; Titanium; Bacterial adhesion; Osseointegration; Soft tissue adhesion

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Engineering, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review scientifically compares the properties of zirconia and titanium, but does not identify the best among them as an implant material. Surface treatment and modification to improve tissue bonding and inhibit bacterial adhesion are not considered in this review. The mechanical properties of titanium are superior to those of zirconia; some studies have shown that zirconia can be used as a dental implant, especially as an abutment. Extensive surface treatment research is ongoing to inhibit bacterial adhesion and improve osseointegration and soft tissue adhesion phenomena which make it difficult to evaluate properties of the materials themselves without surface treatment. Osseointegration of titanium is superior to that of zirconia itself without surface treatment; after surface treatment, both materials show comparable osseointegration. The surface morphology is more important for osseointegration than the surface composition. To inhibit bacterial adhesion, zirconia is superior to titanium, and hence, more suitable for abutments. Both materials show similar capability for soft tissue adhesion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available