Journal
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113226
Keywords
Electronic word-of-mouth; Review helpfulness; Emotion; Gender stereotype
Categories
Funding
- Palumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Using frameworks from the literature on emotion, cognitive processing and gender stereotypes, we extend existing research on online product review helpfulness by demonstrating that reviewer gender moderates the relationship between emotional content and review helpfulness and that readers' perceptions of reviewer credibility explain this effect. In the first study, experimental methods were used to demonstrate that the differential effect of angry vs. non-emotional reviews on review helpfulness was moderated by reviewer gender. Further, findings showed that the negative effect of anger on review helpfulness for female (but not male) reviewers was explained by lower reviewer credibility. In the second study, by analyzing product reviews from the Amazon web site, we found supportive evidence for the results of the first study on the relationship between female-expressed anger and review helpfulness. In addition, we explored the influence of gender stereotypes in terms of the relationship between anxiety and review helpfulness and compared it to anger. Study 2 also allowed us to explore the moderation effect of the contextual emotional tone of other reviews on the target product. Our findings highlight limitations in perceived helpfulness ratings due to gender stereotype biases and offer insights for various decision makers to better understand and manage review helpfulness.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available