4.7 Article

The disruptive impact of additive manufacturing on supply chains: A literature study, conceptual framework and research agenda

Journal

COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 91-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.07.003

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Supply chain design; Literature review; Research agenda; Propositions; Roadmap

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is one of the advanced computer technologies that digitizes supply chains (SCs). This article presents a structured literature review on the impact of AM on SC design based on 67 peer-reviewed articles. We address the business settings in which AM operates, AM SC design choices, and AM SC performance outputs. We use the SCOR model to structure this article. Our results show that while AM is currently used for many applications it is mainly used for small, low demand and geometrically complex products. SC design involves making choices related to SC configurations, supplier relationships, AM production, installation of a return channel, IT system requirements and human resources. The main SC performance outputs influenced by AM are (reduced) SC cost and (improved) SC responsiveness. Many bottlenecks prevent AM being used to its full potential. This article contributes to the AM SC design knowledge base by developing a conceptual framework, including 18 propositions, and a research agenda identifying relevant AM SC design research themes. Moreover, a roadmap is presented describing the steps to a full roll-out of AM for manufacturing purposes, in which bottlenecks (serving as thresholds) need to be eliminated in order to trigger a series of disrupting SC effects. We expect that AM will eventually lead to SC disruption, and has the potential to largely replace conventional manufacturing for mainstream products. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available