4.7 Article

Probabilistic investigation of RFEM topologies for slope stability analysis

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103129

Keywords

Random field; Slope stability; Random finite element method; RFEM; Probabilistic methods; Failure surface; Topology

Funding

  1. Earth Resources Regulation of the Victorian State Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP)
  3. GHERG scholarship programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Random Finite Element Method (RFEM) is an increasingly popular tool in geotechnical engineering, especially for analysis of spatial variation and uncertainty in slope stability. Although the method has gained prominence in recent years, topological effects of strong and weak zones and the impact of their locations remain largely unknown. Although numerous potential slip surface realisations can be generated with RFEM, probabilistic failure statistics are often governed by several representative slip surfaces (RSS). In this research, random field similarity methods and clustering techniques are coupled with RFEM slope stability simulation to determine the impact of shear strength spatial patterns on slope failure mechanisms and safety factors. Regions of significance are highlighted within a case study of a Victorian open-cutbrown coal mine, with particular attention given to the effects on the slope failure surface as well the factor of safety. Results are presented of Factor of Safety distributions when particular slip surfaces and clustering constraints are imposed, providing further understanding of the impacts of shear strength characteristics on probabilistic simulation results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available