4.7 Article

Stability analysis of an electrically cylindrical nanoshell reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107125

Keywords

Piezoelectric layer; Maxwell's equation; Critical voltage; Frequency characteristics; Graphene nanoplatelet; GDQM; Exact length scale parameter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to a rapid development of process manufacturing, composite materials with graphene-reinforcement have obtained so much commercially notices in the promoted engineering applications. With this regard, the critical voltage and frequency characteristics of a graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) composite cylindrical nanoshell coupled with the piezoelectric actuator (PIAC) are investigated. The material properties of piece-wise graphene-reinforced composites (GNPRCs) are assumed to be graded through the thickness direction of a cylindrical nanoshell and are estimated based on a nanomechanical model. For the first time, the current study is considering the effects of the piezoelectric layer, GNPRC and size-effects on the natural frequency and critical voltage of the GNPRC cylindrical nanoshell coupled with PIAC. The governing equations and boundary conditions have been developed using minimum potential energy, and have been solved with the aid of generalized differential quadrature (GDQM). In addition, because of the piezoelectric layer, Maxwell's equation is derived. The results show that piezoelectric layer, GNP distribution pattern, length scale parameter and GNP weight function, play important roles on the natural frequency and critical voltage of the GNP cylindrical nanoshell coupled with PIAC. The results of the current study are useful suggestions for the design of materials science, micro-electromechanical systems and nanoelectromechanical systems such as nanoactuators and nanosensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available