4.7 Article

Deep learning for presumed probability density function models

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 436-450

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.015

Keywords

Large eddy simulation; Presumed probability density function; Low-swirl burner; Machine learning; beta-beta PDF

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08G028308]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  3. National Nuclear Security Administration
  4. Exascale Computing Project (ECP) [17-SC-20-SC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we use machine learning (ML) techniques to develop presumed probability density function (PDF) models for large eddy simulations (LES) of reacting flows. The joint sub-filter PDF of mixture fraction and progress variable is modeled using various ML algorithms and commonly used analytical models. The ML algorithms evaluated in the work are representative of three major classes of ML techniques: traditional ensemble methods (random forests), deep learning (deep neural network (DNN)s), and generative learning (conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE)). The first two algorithms are supervised learning algorithms, and the third is an unsupervised learning algorithm. Data from direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the low-swirl burner[1] are used to develop training data for sub-filter PDF models. Models are evaluated on predictions of the sub-filter PDF as well as predictions of the filtered reaction rate of the progress variable, computed through an integral of the product of the sub-filter PDF and the conditional means of the reaction rate. This a-priori modeling study demonstrates that deep learning models for presumed PDF modeling are three times more accurate than analytical beta-beta PDF models and linear regression models. These models are as accurate as random forest models while using five times fewer trainable parameters and being 25 times faster for inference. In this work, conditional unsupervised learning did not present additional advantages beyond supervised learning with a feed-forward neural network. We illustrate how models generalize to other regions of the flow and develop criteria based on the Jensen-Shannon divergence to quantify the performance of a model on new data. (C) 2019 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available