4.7 Article

Experimental study of ethanol oxidation behind reflected shock waves: Ignition delay time and H2O laser-absorption measurements

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 313-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.005

Keywords

Ethanol; Shock tube; Ignition; H2O laser absorption

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-EE0007981]
  2. Louisiana State University (LSU)
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-1706825]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxidation of ethanol was investigated in shock tubes by measuring ignition delay times and water time history profiles. A laser absorption technique was used in the latter case. Ignition delay times were investigated for three equivalence ratios, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0, and for pressures ranging from 1.3 to 53 atm. The fuel concentration and the type of diluent used were also varied. The ignition delay times were in very good agreement with results from the literature for the very few overlapping conditions, and most of the experimental conditions have never been studied before. A high level of accuracy was observed for the predictions of the ignition delay times from detailed kinetics mechanisms. Inhomogeneous ignition events were observed in some specific conditions, validating the notions of thermal diffusivity and flame thickness developed in the literature for the reasons behind such inhomogeneous ignition. The water time-history profiles showed the formation of water in two stages. These profiles were also modeled using well-known detailed kinetic mechanisms from the literature. Severe discrepancies were often observed for laser-absorption measurements, and this was the case with most of the models. A numerical analysis (sensitivity and rate-of-production) was conducted using the two best-performing literature mechanisms (namely, AramcoMech3.0 and CRECK). (C) 2019 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available