4.7 Article

Association of Long-Term Nicotine Abstinence With Normal Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-5 Binding

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 474-480

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.027

Keywords

Abstinence; Addiction; Glutamate; mGluR5; Nicotine; Relapse

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma AG
  2. OPO Foundation
  3. Olga Mayenfisch Foundation
  4. Vontobel Foundation
  5. Hartmann Muller Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Nicotine addiction is a major public health problem and is associated with primary glutamatergic dysfunction. We recently showed marked global reductions in metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) binding in smokers and recent ex-smokers (average abstinence duration of 25 weeks). The goal of this study was to examine the role of mGluR5 downregulation in nicotine addiction by investigating a group of long-term ex-smokers (abstinence >1.5 years), and to explore associations between mGluR5 binding and relapse in recent ex-smokers. METHODS: Images of mGluR5 receptor binding were acquired in 14 long-term ex-smokers, using positron emission tomography with radiolabeled [11C]ABP688, which binds to an allosteric site with high specificity. RESULTS: Long-term ex-smokers and individuals who had never smoked showed no differences in mGluR5 binding in any of the brain regions examined. Long-term ex-smokers showed significantly higher mGluR5 binding than recent ex-smokers, most prominently in the frontal cortex (42%) and thalamus (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that downregulation of mGluR5 is a pathogenetic mechanism underlying nicotine dependence and the high relapse rate in individuals previously exposed to nicotine. Therefore, mGluR5 receptor binding appears to be an effective biomarker in smoking and a promising target for the discovery of novel medication for nicotine dependence and other substance-related disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available