4.2 Article

Perceived Barriers to Follow AHA Dietary Recommendations in Hypercholesterolemic Patients

Journal

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 146-153

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1054773819883177

Keywords

perceived barriers; hypercholesterolemia; dietary adherence

Categories

Funding

  1. Nutritional research center, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify barriers to American Heart Association dietary recommendations in hypercholesterolemic patients, and found that factors such as psychological factors, false beliefs and food habits affect dietary adherence. Considering these barriers, incorporating patient's culture, traditions, and dietary preferences can be beneficial in improving dietary adherence among hypercholesterolemic patients.
Hypercholesterolemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle modification including dietary changes is the first step for the treatment. Low adherence to dietary recommendations has reported earlier. This study purposed to identify barriers to the American Heart Association dietary recommendations in hypercholesterolemic patients. A 30-item structured questionnaire was designed and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated. The exploratory factor analysis was performed on 160 hypercholesterolemic patients and extracted seven interpretable underlying factors of diet non-adherence (52.35% of total variance). These factors included situational barriers and gathering, takeaways and eating out, psychological factors, false beliefs and food habits, lack of motivation, enjoy eating and difficulty resisting the temptation and satisfaction with previous food habits. From the practical point of view, considering these perceived barriers, patient's culture, traditions, and dietary preferences can be beneficial in improving dietary adherence among hypercholesterolemic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available