Journal
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1605-1615Publisher
AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01570219
Keywords
pathology; systemic lupus erythematosus; glomerulonephritis; humans; lupus nephritis; glomerulonephritis; Membranoproliferative; glomerulonephritis; Membranous; glomerulonephritis; IGA; control groups; kidney; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; biopsy; kidney biopsy; Staining and Labeling
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD009223]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background and objectivesIn 2012, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics proposed that lupus nephritis, in the presence of positive ANA or anti-dsDNA antibody, is sufficient to diagnose SLE. However, this ?stand-alone? kidney biopsy criterion is problematic because the ISN/RPS classification does not specifically define lupus nephritis. We investigated the combination of pathologic features with optimal sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lupus nephritis.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThree hundred consecutive biopsies with lupus nephritis and 560 contemporaneous biopsies with nonlupus glomerulopathies were compared. Lupus nephritis was diagnosed if there was a clinical diagnosis of SLE and kidney biopsy revealed findings compatible with lupus nephritis. The control group consisted of consecutives biopsies showing diverse glomerulopathies from patients without SLE, including IgA nephropathy, membranous glomerulopathy, pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (excluding C3 GN), and infection-related glomerulonephritis. Sensitivity and specificity of individual pathologic features and combinations of features were computed.ResultsFive characteristic features of lupus nephritis were identified: ?full-house? staining by immunofluorescence, intense C1q staining, extraglomerular deposits, combined subendothelial and subepithelial deposits, and endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions, each with sensitivity ranging from 0.68 to 0.80 and specificity from 0.8 to 0.96. The presence of at least two, three, or four of the five criteria had a sensitivity of 0.92, 0.8, and 0.66 for the diagnosis of lupus nephritis, and a specificity of 0.89, 0.95, and 0.98.ConclusionsIn conclusion, combinations of pathologic features can distinguish lupus nephritis from nonlupus glomerulopathies with high specificity and varying sensitivity. Even with stringent criteria, however, rare examples of nonlupus glomerulopathies may exhibit characteristic features of lupus nephritis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available