4.5 Article

Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 174-182

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13677

Keywords

biomechanics; cornea; corvis; DALK; keratoconus; keratoplasty; PKP

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Importance Keratoplasty is a surgical procedure to create a more regular optical surface following biomechanical weakening of the cornea in keratoconus. The ideal keratoplasty procedure should also restore corneal biomechanics to that of the healthy cornea. Background This study aimed to evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of corneas following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and predescematic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) to those of healthy eyes. Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants Two cohorts of post-keratoplasty eyes (42 eyes with PKP and 27 eyes with DALK) with each other, and with a cohort of 152 healthy eyes. Methods All eyes were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, tomography, anterior segment-OCT and non-contact tonometry CorVis ST (CST). Main Outcome Measures CST biomechanical parameters, maximum corneal deformation (MCD) and corneal energy dissipation were compared between keratoplasty techniques, and with healthy eyes. Results The mean age of participants with PKP and DALK were 35 +/- 13.7 and 36.1 +/- 12.6 years, respectively. None of the CST parameters were significantly different between PKP and DALK eyes. However, when compared to healthy corneas, numerous parameters were significantly different for both keratoplasty techniques. Of note, MCD was significantly higher in PKP compared to DALK and healthy corneas, after controlling for co-factors. Conclusions and Relevance Neither type of keratoplasty technique utilized in keratoconus completely restored corneal biomechanical properties to that of healthy corneas. However, PKP resulted in a greater number of parameters significantly different to healthy corneas, compared to DALK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available