4.2 Article

Inflammatory serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 277-283

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-019-01807-5

Keywords

Urinary calculi; Ureteral stone; Renal colic; Spontaneous stone passage; Inflammatory marker; Prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Ureteral stones pose a high economic and medical burden among Emergency Department (ED) admissions. Management strategies vary from expectant therapy to surgical interventions. However, predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage are still not well understood. We aim to explore the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios in the spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP). Methods Chart review was done for 619 patients who presented to our institution's ED with non-febrile renal colic and received a radiological diagnosis of ureteral stone of less than 10 mm. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were collected. The Linear-by-Linear Association test was used to look at the trend among the NLR and PLR quartiles and other demographic variables. Univariate analysis was run for the collected variables. Then, a hierarchal backward multivariate logistic regression was run for each of NLR and PLR variables. To validate the results, bootstrapping was undertaken for each model. Results NLR between 2.87 and 4.87 had odds ratio (OR) 2.96 (95% CI 1.80-5.49) and an NLR > 4.87 had 3.63 (2.04-6.69) the odds of retained ureteral stone. A PLR between 10.42 and 15.25 and a PLR > 15.25 had 3.28 (1.79-6.19) and 3.84 (2.28-7.12) the odds of failed SSP, respectively. Other significant variables in the two models are diabetes, urine leukocyte esterase > 10 white blood cell/mu l, moderate-to-severe hydronephrosis, and stone size. Conclusion NLR and PLR are inversely associated with SSP of ureteral stones. In adjunct with other indicators, NLR and PLR are inflammatory markers that could be used in the clinical decision of ureteral stone management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available