4.7 Article

Diagnostic and prognostic value of the cancer-testis antigen lactate dehydrogenase C4 in breast cancer

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 503, Issue -, Pages 203-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.032

Keywords

Lactate dehydrogenase C4; Breast cancer; Serum; Exosome; Diagnosis; Prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802631]
  2. Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project [2016-ZQN-17]
  3. Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian province [2017Y9073]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province, China [2018Y2003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lactate dehydrogenase C4 (LDH-C4) as a cancer/testis antigen (CTA) is abnormally expressed in some malignant tumors. However, the expression and clinical significance of LDH-C4 in breast cancer (BC) has not been characterized. Methods: We determined LDHC mRNA expression in serum and serum-derived exosomes of BC patients by quantitative RT-PCR. We also evaluated the protein expression of LDH-C4 in BC tissues using high-throughput tissue microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry. Results: Our results showed high mRNA expression level of LDHC in serum and serum-derived exosomes of BC patients. The LDHC level in serum and exosomes could distinguish BC cases from healthy individuals based on their AUCs of 0.9587 and 0.9464, respectively. Besides, the LDHC level in exosomes of BC patients associated with tumor size, and positively correlated with HER2 and Ki-67 expressions (all with P < 0.05). Serum and exosomal level of LDHC negatively correlated with medical treatment and positively with the recurrence of BC. Survival analysis showed that LDH-C4 expression negatively correlated with BC prognosis. Conclusion: Serum and exosomal LDHC may be an effective indicator for the diagnosis, efficacy evaluation, and monitoring the recurrence of BC. LDH-C4 may act as a biomarker that predicts BC prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available