4.5 Article

Assessment of the Laurentian Great Lakes' hydrological conditions in a changing climate

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages 243-259

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02530-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  2. Ministere de l' Economie et de l'Innovation du Quebec (MEI)
  3. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (FRQ-NT)
  4. Mitacs
  5. Ouranos consortium
  6. Fonds Vert Quebec [IT09276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A set of 28 simulations from five regional climate models are used in this study to assess the Great Lakes' water supply from 1953 to 2100 following emissions scenarios RCP4.5 and 8.5 with a focus on bi-weekly changes in the means and extremes of hydrological variables. Models are first evaluated by comparing annual cycles of precipitation, runoff, evaporation and net basin supply (NBS) with observations. Trends in mean values are then studied for each variable using Theil-Sen's statistical test. Changes in extreme conditions are analyzed using generalized extreme values distributions for a reference period (1971-2000) and two future periods (2041-2070 and 2071-2100). Ensemble trend results show evaporation increases of 136 and 204 mm (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) over the Great Lakes between 1953 and 2100. Precipitation increases by 83 and 140 mm and runoff increases by 68 and 135 mm. Trends are not equally distributed throughout the year as seasonal changes differ greatly. As a result, Great Lakes net basin supply is expected to increase in winter and spring and decrease in summer. Over the entire year, NBS increases of 14 and 70 mm are projected for scenarios RCP4.5 and 8.5 respectively by the year 2100. An analysis of extreme values reveals that precipitation and NBS maxima increase by 11 to 27% and 1 to 9% respectively, while NBS minima decrease by 18 to 29% between 1971-2000 and 2041-2100.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available