4.2 Article

Abatement potential and shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion in China's secondary industry

Journal

CLIMATE RESEARCH
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 9-22

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/cr01572

Keywords

Shadow price; Technical inefficiency; Directional distance function; CO2 emissions reduction; Secondary industry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71603039]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571309]
  3. Doctoral Startup Funds of Liaoning Province [201601049]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18JC12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions performance is crucial to make policies for abatement. This study applies the parameterized quadratic directional output distance function to estimate the technical inefficiency, abatement potential and shadow price of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion in China's secondary industry during 2001-2015. The CO2 emissions performances in 3 major regions show significant differences and regional characteristics. The developed eastern region has the highest CO2 emissions and abatement potential but the lowest values in terms of CO2 intensity, technical efficiency and shadow price. The indicators of the developing central region are in the mid-level position, and in the undeveloped western region, CO2 emissions reduction via efficiency improvement is limited, and abatement will incur huge economic costs. Emissions reduction targets and control policies designed at regional levels are necessary. The provinces with relatively low shadow prices should be assigned higher CO2 emissions reduction targets, while those with high shadow prices should have lower reduction targets. Meanwhile, the differentiated shadow prices make it feasible for China to establish a cross-regional unified emissions trading market to further the cooperation between provinces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available