4.7 Article

Co-combustion of industrial coal slurry and sewage sludge: Thermochemical and emission behavior of heavy metals

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages 440-451

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.256

Keywords

Sewage sludge; Coal slurry; Thermogravimetric analysis; Co-combustion; Heavy metals

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672144]
  2. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX20180287]
  3. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1908085QD154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combination of thermogravimetric analysis and lab-scale fixed bed combustion experiments was carried out to study the thermochemical, kinetic and heavy metals emission behavior during co-combustion of industrial coal slurry (CS) and sewage sludge (SS). The results found that the blends had integrative combustion profiles which reflected both coal slurry and sewage sludge. During co-combustion, the ignition performance of CS could be significantly improved with the addition of SS. Synergetic effects of the co-combustion were observed at lower temperature, while the high-temperature char combustion of the blends was inhibited because of high ash components of SS or formation of inactive alkali metal aluminosilicates. Kinetic analysis confirmed the improve iginition behavior of blends. Both the comprehensive combustibility index S and the activation energy suggested that the blends with 20% SS may have the best promoting effects. Compared with CS, the higher concentration of Cl in SS increased the volatilization ratios of Cu, Zn, As, and Pb. When added CS into SS, the volatilization ratios of arsenic decreased during combustion. The inhibition effects for arsenic during co-combustion might be associated with the capture of arsenic vapors by the new-formed Ca/Al from CS thermal decomposition. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available