4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

New ternary blend limestone calcined clay cement for solidification/stabilization of zinc contaminated soil

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 308-315

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.051

Keywords

Zinc; Limestone calcined clay cement; Strength; Leachability sequential extraction procedure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the potential use of a new limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) for stabilization/solidification of zinc contaminated soil. LC3 is a new ternary blend manufactured by the replacement of 50% cement clinker by locally available two supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) - limestone and calcined clay. The incorporation of LC3 is evaluated on the soil spiked with 0.5% and 1% of Zinc (Zn) at curing times of 3, 7, 14, 28 and 56 days. pH, strength and leachability properties of the solidified/stabilised soil are measured for both mechanical and environmental conditions. Additionally, sequential extraction procedure (SEP), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis are performed to elucidate the mechanisms of Zn immobilization in the soil. The results show that the leachable Zn concentrations in the stabilised soil are well below the corresponding hazardous waste management regulatory limit after the curing time of 14 days. The soil pH and unconfined compressive strength of the stabilised soil increase with curing time. The SEP results confirm that LC3 considerably reduces the acid soluble fraction (F1) and increase the residual fraction (F4). The XRD and SEM results indicate that formation of Tri-calcium Silicate 3CaO center dot SiO2, Portlandite Ca(OH)(2), Ettringite Ca6Al2(SO4)(3)(OH)(12).26 H2O and Wulfingite Zn(OH)(2) are the primary mechanisms for the immobilization of Zn in the LC3 stabilised soil. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available