4.6 Article

Non-covalent Interactions and Charge Transfer between Propene and Neutral Yttrium-Doped and Pure Gold Clusters

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 69, Pages 15795-15804

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201902794

Keywords

adsorption; clusters; gas phase; gold; reaction

Funding

  1. KU Leuven-Budapest University of Technology and Economics [CELSA/18/032]
  2. FWO (Research Foundation Flanders)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dopant and size-dependent propene adsorption on neutral gold (Au-n) and yttrium-doped gold (Aun-1Y) clusters in the n = 5-15 size range are investigated, combining mass spectrometry and gas phase reactions in a low-pressure collision cell and density functional theory calculations. The adsorption energies, extracted from the experimental data using an RRKM analysis, show a similar size dependence as the quantum chemical results and are in the range of approximate to 0.6-1.2 eV. Yttrium doping significantly alters the propene adsorption energies for n = 5, 12 and 13. Chemical bonding and energy decomposition analysis showed that there is no covalent bond between the cluster and propene, and that charge transfer and other non-covalent interactions are dominant. The natural charges, Wiberg bond indices, and the importance of charge transfer all support an electron donation/back-donation mechanism for the adsorption. Yttrium plays a significant role not only in the propene binding energy, but also in the chemical bonding in the cluster-propene adduct. Propene preferentially binds to yttrium in small clusters (n<10), and to a gold atom at larger sizes. Besides charge transfer, relaxation also plays an important role, illustrating the non-local effect of the yttrium dopant. It is shown that the frontier molecular orbitals of the clusters determine the chemical bonding, in line with the molecular-like electronic structure of metal clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available