4.6 Article

Mesoporous Cu-Ce-Ox Solid Solutions from Spray Pyrolysis for Superior Low-Temperature CO Oxidation

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 68, Pages 15586-15593

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201903680

Keywords

CO oxidation; Cu-Ce-O-x; mesoporous materials; spray pyrolysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21801003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1808085QB47]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Education Department [KJ2017A111]
  4. Fund for Outstanding Youth of Anhui Polytechnic University [2019JQ01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of Pt group metal-free catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation remains critical. In this work, active and stable mesoporous Cu-Ce-O-x solid solutions are prepared by using spray pyrolysis. The specific surface areas and pore volumes reach as high as 170 m(2) g(-1) and 0.24 cm(3) g(-1), respectively. The results of CO oxidation study suggest that (1) the catalyst obtained by spray pyrolysis possesses much higher activity than those made by co-precipitation, sol-gel, and hydrothermal methods; (2) the optimal Cu-0.2-Ce-0.8-O-x solid solution presents a reactivity over 28 times that of both single-component CuO and CeO2 at 70 degrees C. Based on the study of pure-phase Cu-Ce-O-x solid solutions by selective leaching of segregated CuOx species, the active center for CO oxidation is confirmed as the bimetallic Cu-Ce-O site, whereas the individual CuOx particles not only act as spectators but also block the active Cu-Ce-O sites. A low apparent activation energy of approximately 48 kJ mol(-1) is detected for CO oxidation at the Cu-Ce-O site, making Cu-Ce-O-x solid solutions able to present high activity at low temperature. Furthermore, the Cu-Ce-O-x catalysts exhibit excellent stability and thermal tolerance toward CO oxidation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available