4.6 Article

Modelling reaction and diffusion in a wax-filled hollow cylindrical pellet of Fischer Tropsch catalyst

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 958-969

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.06.051

Keywords

Modelling; Fischer Tropsch catalyst; Cylindrical geometry; Reaction and diffusion

Funding

  1. EPSRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous modelling of fixed-bed, Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reactors has demonstrated the advantages relative to spherical pellets of using cylindrical and shaped pellets to provide improved transport attributes under conditions relevant to industrial operation. However, mass transport models have focussed on the investigation of transport within pellets with spherical symmetry, whilst detailed investigations of more complex shapes have not been undertaken. Here, a pseudo-isothermal, steady-state, two-dimensional model was investigated for catalyst pellets of cylindrical form, both solid and hollow. A cobalt-based catalyst was considered at conditions where the rate of condensable hydrocarbon generation is large enough to result in the accumulation of liquid hydrocarbons in the pores of a catalyst. It was found that effectiveness factors were bounded by those of sphere and slab above and below Thiele moduli of similar to 0.75 and similar to 1.15, respectively, for the conditions examined, with the effectiveness factors exceeding those of both sphere and slab models between these moduli. Here, comparisons were made on the basis of the characteristic diffusion length, the catalyst particle's volume divided by its external surface area. However, values of the FT chain growth parameter, alpha, between these values of Thiele modulus were lower than those of both sphere and slab geometry, and thus under these conditions hollow cylinders gave the greatest methane selectivity. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available