4.7 Article

Synthesis of shape and structure-dependent hydroxyapatite nanostructures as a superior adsorbent for removal of U(VI)

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 384, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123262

Keywords

Shape and structure-control; HAP; Uranium; Removal; Complexation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundations of China [U1501231, 51708143, 51508116]
  2. Project of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radioactive Contamination Control and Resources [2017B030314182]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201804020072, 201804010366]
  4. Foundation of Department of Education of Guangdong Province of China [2018KTSCX176]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly efficient removal of U(VI) from uranium-containing wastewaters is urgently needed with the global nuclear energy exploitation. Herein, we design a large-scale fabrication of shape and structure-dependent hydroxyapatite (HAP) nanostructures produced using a facile hydrothermal method in absence of any organic solvents and templates. It was found that the hydrothermal reaction temperature was a vital factor affecting the morphology (turned from nanosheets to nanoribbons and finally to nanoblocks) and structure (turned from monetize to hydroxyapatite and from calcium hydrogen phosphate hydrate to hydroxyapatite) of HAP. Moreover, the obtained HAP-180 exhibits highly efficient removal of U(VI) (99.3% removal of U(VI) within 30 s), and with the maximum adsorption capacity of 2024 mg/g, which is higher than those of HAP-120, HAP-150 and other materials previously reported. The superior removal performance is ascribed to the specific structure of HAP-180 and effective complexation with U(VI) ions. The findings of this work indicate that the morphology and structure of HAP can be feasible adjustment, and it is promising as environmental remediation material for U(VI) clean-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available