4.3 Article

Low density polyethylene tubular reactor control using state space model predictive control

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 208, Issue 4, Pages 500-516

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2019.1674816

Keywords

Model predictive control (MPC); low density polyethylene (LDPE); tubular reactor control; state space MPC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the application of state space model predictive control (SS-MPC) in controlling LDPE polymerization tubular reactor process and shows that MPC is more effective in handling polymer grade transition and disturbance rejection compared to PID controller.
One of the conventional commodity polymers in the world is Low density polyethylene (LDPE). LDPE is mostly produced from free radical polymerization of ethylene gas under high pressure and temperature environment. However, the control of LDPE polymerization reactor is challenging due to the complexity of the polymerization process and the nature of the reactor itself. Thus, this study explores the application statespace model predictive control (SS-MPC) in controlling LDPE polymerization tubular reactor process. SS-MPC is a type of model predictive control (MPC) scheme which utilizes state space model as its process model. In general, MPC control scheme has a wide application in the industry due to its ability to handle multivariable control and optimize process performance. In order to implement the control scheme, a dynamic model of the reactor was developed using Aspen Dynamic. The dynamic model is then linked with MATLAB Simulink for online control implementation. The LDPE polymerization process was controlled by regulating the initiator and chain transfer agent (CTA) flowrate to control reactor temperature and polymer Melt Flow Index (MFI) grade. The state space model was identified using identification technique through two approaches; MIMO model and augmented SISO model. In order to evaluate the controller performance, MFI grade transition and disturbance rejection tests are conducted along with PID controller, as a comparison. Based on the tests, MPC had presented a notable performance in handling polymer grade transition (Integral squared error, ISE = 4530) and disturbance rejection (ISE = 99.03) in MFI profile compared to PID controller respond (ISE = 7003 for set point tracking and ISE = 12.66 for disturbance rejection). Nonetheless, PID controller had also presented a comparable performance in controlling maximum reactor temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available