4.7 Article

Bioethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunch with SSF and SHF processes using Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 301-314

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-019-02778-2

Keywords

Bioethanol; Oil palm empty fruit bunch; Acid-alkali pretreatment; Kluyveromyces marxianus; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation

Funding

  1. Prince of Songkla University [ENG590710S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed to study bioethanol production from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches (OPEFB) with Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF) and Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation (SHF) by Klyveromyces marxinus. The basic steps for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass are (1) pretreatment for delignification, which is necessary to liberate cellulose and hemicellulose; (2) hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose to generate fermentable sugars; and (3) fermentation of bioethanol from sugars. In step (1) OPEFB was subjected to acid-alkali pretreatment with a dilute acid solution (at substrate loading 12.50%w/v, sulfuric acid concentration 0.2 M, at 121 degrees C for 53 min) followed by an alkali solution (NaOH 5%w/v, at 121 degrees C for 20 min), which resulted in 72.10%wt cellulose yield with hemicellulose and lignin yields of 3.24%wt and 17.60%wt, respectively. Then the optimal conditions for ethanol production by SSF process were investigated by Response Surface Methodology. The four manipulated factors were temperature (30-45 degrees C), substrate loading (5-15% w/v), pH (4-6), and yeast concentration (1-5%v/v), and the maximal 0.281 g/g bioethanol yield was found at 12.24%w/v, pH 4.5, yeast concentration 2.04%v/v, and 36.94 degrees C. In SHF, hydrolysis and fermentation steps were conducted at the optimal conditions for SSF, giving 0.584 g/g reducing sugar and 0.258 g/g bioethanol yield. The results demonstrate that an acid-alkali pretreatment could remove hemicellulose and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass, increasing cellulose yield, while SSF performed better than SHF with both quicker processing and higher bioethanol concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available