4.8 Article

Gut Microbiome Fermentation Determines the Efficacy of Exercise for Diabetes Prevention

Journal

CELL METABOLISM
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 77-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1305003, 2015CB553603]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council/Area of Excellence [AoE/M/707-18]
  3. Collaborative Research Fund [C7037-17W]
  4. General Research Fund [17128115]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600660]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [CRC/Transregio 124]
  7. Innovative Training Networks, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 [813781]
  8. DFG under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2051, 390713860]
  9. Marie Skoldowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exercise is an effective strategy for diabetes management but is limited by the phenomenon of exercise resistance (i.e., the lack of or the adverse response to exercise on metabolic health). Here, in 39 medication-naive men with prediabetes, we found that exercise-induced alterations in the gut microbiota correlated closely with improvements in glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity entry (clinicaltrials.gov entry NCT03240978). The microbiome of responders exhibited an enhanced capacity for biosynthesis of short-chain fatty acids and catabolism of branched-chain amino acids, whereas those of non-responders were characterized by increased production of metabolically detrimental compounds. Fecal microbial transplantation from responders, but not non-responders, mimicked the effects of exercise on alleviation of insulin resistance in obese mice. Furthermore, a machine-learning algorithm integrating baseline microbial signatures accurately predicted personalized glycemic response to exercise in an additional 30 subjects. These findings raise the possibility of maximizing the benefits of exercise by targeting the gut microbiota.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available