4.7 Review

Flipping the dogma - phosphatidylserine in non-apoptotic cell death

Journal

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-019-0437-0

Keywords

Cell death; Inflammation; Apoptosis; Necroptosis; Phosphatidylserine; AnnexinV; Phagocytosis; Extracellular vesicles; ESCRT; Efferocytosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1416/15, 818/18]
  2. alpha-1 Foundation [615533]
  3. U.S. - Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) [2017176]
  4. Varda and Boaz Dotan research center in Hemato-Oncology, Tel-Aviv University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer plasma membrane has long been considered a unique feature of apoptotic cells. Together with other eat me signals, it enables the recognition and phagocytosis of dying cells (efferocytosis), helping to explain the immunologically-silent nature of apoptosis. Recently, however, PS exposure has also been reported in non-apoptotic forms of regulated inflammatory cell death, such as necroptosis, challenging previous dogma. In this review, we outline the evidence for PS exposure in non-apoptotic cells and extracellular vesicles (EVs), and discuss possible mechanisms based on our knowledge of apoptotic-PS exposure. In addition, we examine the outcomes of non-apoptotic PS exposure, including the reversibility of cell death, efferocytosis, and consequent inflammation. By examining PS biology, we challenge the established approach of distinguishing apoptosis from other cell death pathways by AnnexinV staining of PS externalization. Finally, we re-evaluate how PS exposure is thought to define apoptosis as an immunologically silent process distinct from other non-apoptotic and inflammatory cell death pathways. Ultimately, we suggest that a complete understanding of how regulated cell death processes affect the immune system is far from being fully elucidated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available