4.7 Editorial Material

Why did remote ischaemic conditioning not improve clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial?

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 115, Issue 14, Pages E161-E163

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz242

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [CS/14/3/31002, FS/10/039/28270]
  2. University College London Hospital/University College London Biomedical Research Clinical Research grant
  3. Danish Innovation Foundation [11-108354, 11-115818]
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF13OC0007447, NNF14OC0013337, NNF15OC0016674]
  5. Trygfonden [109624]
  6. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  7. Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist-Senior Investigator scheme [NMRC/CSA-SI/0011/2017]
  8. Collaborative Centre Grant scheme [NMRC/CGAug16C006]
  9. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [MOE2016-T2-2-021]
  10. COST Action EU-CARDIOPROTECTION [CA16225]
  11. COST [European Cooperation in Science and Technology]
  12. MRC [MC_G1002673] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available