4.5 Article

Shared Genetic Etiology of Obesity-Related Traits and Barrett's Esophagus/Adenocarcinoma: Insights from Genome-Wide Association Studies

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 427-433

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0374

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BONFOR-program of the Medical Faculty, University of Bonn [O-149.0121]
  2. DietBodyBrain (DietBB) Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EA1809B]
  3. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  4. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH081862, R01MH087590]
  5. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01HG008976]
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U01HL089856, U01HL089897, P01HL120839, P01HL132825]
  7. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation [2013_A118]
  8. Medical Research Council [RG84369]
  9. UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, from Addenbrooke's Hospital
  10. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  11. Cancer Research UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Obesity is a major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and its precursor Barrett's esophagus (BE). Research suggests that individuals with high genetic risk to obesity have a higher BE/EA risk. To facilitate understanding of biological factors that lead to progression from BE to EA, the present study investigated the shared genetic background of BE/EA and obesity-related traits. Methods: Cross-trait linkage disequilibrium score regression was applied to summary statistics from genome-wide association metaanalyses on BE/EA and on obesity traits. Body mass index (BMI) was used as a proxy for general obesity, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) for abdominal obesity. For single marker analyses, all genome-wide significant risk alleles for BMI and WHR were compared with summary statistics of the BE/EA meta-analyses. Results: Sex-combined analyses revealed a significant genetic correlation between BMI and BE/EA (r(g) = 0.13, P = 2 x 10(-04)) and a r(g) of 0.12 between WHR and BE/EA (P = 1 x 10(-02)). Sexspecific analyses revealed a pronounced genetic correlation between BMI and EA in females (r(g) = 0.17, P = 1.2 x 10(-03)), and WHR and EA in males (r(g) = 0.18, P = 1.51 x 10(-02)). On the single marker level, significant enrichment of concordant effects was observed for BMI and BE/EA risk variants (P = 8.45 x 10(-03)) and WHR and BE/EA risk variants (P = 2 x 10(-02)). Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for sex-specific genetic correlations that might reflect specific biological mechanisms. The data demonstrate that shared genetic factors are particularly relevant in progression from BE to EA. Impact: Our study quantifies the genetic correlation between BE/EA and obesity. Further research is now warranted to elucidate these effects and to understand the shared pathophysiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available