4.4 Article

The burn comb model revisited

Journal

BURNS
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 675-681

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.09.011

Keywords

Burn; Thermal injury; Burn model; Burn comb model; Secondary burn progression

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [32003B-108408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The burn comb model is a well-established model for studying secondary burn progression. It creates four rectangularbum surfaces intercalated by three unburned zones prone to secondarybum progression. While bum progression is atri-dimensional phenomenon, of which the vertical extension from the superficial to deeper tissue layer is clinically most relevant, the models initial focus was mainlyon the horizontal surface extension within interspaces. The aim ofthis study is to evaluate the correlation between horizontal surface and vertical depth burn progression. Methods: 24 large (400-450 g) Wistar male rats underwent standardized burn injuries using a burn comb. Laser Doppler flowmetry to assess perfusion, planimetric evaluation of burn progression within interspaces and histological analyses assessing burn depth were performed before burn induction (baseline; BL) and after 1 h, as well as after 1, 4, and 7 days. Histological burn depth was graded from superficial (1) to the subcutaneous layer (5). Furthermore, final scarring time and contracture rate were also assessed. Results: The burn comb resulted in consistent and uniform superficial burns (mean +/- SEM burn depth score: 2 +/- 0; hour 1) separated by intact but critically perfused interspaces (63 +/- 1% of BL; p <0.05 vs. BL). Tissue damage significantly progressed to the deep dermis within the first day (burn depth score 4.3 +/- 0.2; p <0.05 vs. hour 1), while significant interspace necrosis at the surface did not develop within this time period (4 +/- 3% of interspace necrosis; p n.s vs. hour 1). However, interspace necrosis was observed at day 4 (83 +/- 3%; p < 0.05 vs. hour 1) and further progressed until day 7 (94 +/- 2%; p < 0.05 vs. hour 1). Conclusion: This study shows the limits of the burn comb model originally described with a discrepancy between horizontal surface and vertical depth progression of the burn injury. We herein propose a necessary refinement of this model to adequately evaluate vertical depth progression using a histological score. This revisited approach focusing on assessment of depth progression of the burn will allow a better evaluation of experimental burn treatments in future. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available