4.7 Review

A comprehensive review and evaluation of computational methods for identifying protein complexes from protein-protein interaction networks

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 1531-1548

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz085

Keywords

protein complexes; protein-protein interaction networks; cluster-quality-based methods; node-affinity-based methods; ensemble clustering methods

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61672184, 61732012, 61822306]
  2. Fok Ying-Tung Education Foundation for Young Teachers in the Higher Education Institutions of China [161063]
  3. Shenzhen Overseas High Level Talents Innovation Foundation [KQJSCX20170327161949608]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016A030306008]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation in Shenzhen [JCYJ20180306172207178]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein complexes are the fundamental units for many cellular processes. Identifying protein complexes accurately is critical for understanding the functions and organizations of cells.With the increment of genome-scale protein-protein interaction (PPI) data for different species, various computational methods focus on identifying protein complexes from PPI networks. In this article, we give a comprehensive and updated review on the state-of-the-art computational methods in the field of protein complex identification, especially focusing on the newly developed approaches. The computational methods are organized into three categories, including cluster-quality-based methods, node-affinity-based methods and ensemble clustering methods. Furthermore, the advantages and disadvantages of different methods are discussed, and then, the performance of 17 state-of-the-art methods is evaluated on two widely used benchmark data sets. Finally, the bottleneck problems and their potential solutions in this important field are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available