4.4 Article

Goal-setting and attainment in prolonged disorders of consciousness - development of a structured approach

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 78-88

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1682190

Keywords

Brain injuries; consciousness disorders; goals; patient care planning; patient outcome assessment

Funding

  1. London North West University Healthcare Trust Charitable Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To develop a structured goal-set for use in programs for the assessment and management of prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC). Methods: A retrospective analysis of goals from a consecutive cohort of patients (n = 162) admitted to a specialist in-patient PDOC program in the UK from 2007 to 2018. Overall goal attainment was examined with Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) using the GAS-Light method. Rates of individual goal-setting and achievement were examined for both standardized objectives (n = 2959) and personalized goals (n = 661). Goal statements from the personalized goals were independently reviewed and mapped to the domains of the existing structured objective set to identify any missing goal areas. Results: Mean outcome GAS T-scores were 47.2 (95% CI: 46.7, 47.6) and 47.7 (95% CI: 46.7, 48.8), respectively, for the standardized and personally set goals. These were closely correlated (r = 0.482, p < .001) with no significant difference between them. Analysis of goal achievement within each domain identified goals that were/were not likely to be achieved. An initial structured set of 20 standardized objectives in 12 domains was expanded and re-organized to produce a final-structured goal-set of 36 objectives in 18 domains. Conclusions: Developed through real-life clinical practice, this first published structured goal-set for PDOC programs now requires testing in other services/settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available