4.6 Article

Plasma expression of miRNA-21,-214,-34a, and-200a in patients with persistent HPV infection and cervical lesions

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6066-6

Keywords

microRNA; High-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV); Cervical lesions

Categories

Funding

  1. Nanjing Medical Technology Development Project [YKK14079]
  2. 'Research of clinical basis and application of high-risk HPV infection, CIN and cervical cancer related factors'
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Department [BE2012606]
  4. National Health and Family Planning Commission, Science and Education Department [201502004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To examine differences in the plasma levels of miRNA-21, - 214, -34a, and -200a in patients with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection or with cervical lesions of different grades. Methods: Venous blood was collected from 232 individuals to measure the plasma expression levels of miRNA-21, - 214, -34a, and -200a. The subjects included normal controls and patients with persistent hr-HPV infection, CIN1, CIN2, CIN3, or cervical cancer (n = 42, 31, 19, 54, 71, and 15 patients, respectively). Cervical conization specimens were collected from all the women. To ensure the accuracy of histopathology, three consecutive tissue sections with an identical diagnosis were selected, and dissection samples were taken from them for miRNA detection. Eligible cases met the inclusion criteria based on sample observation using the middle slice of sandwich tissue sections from the pathological tissue in accordance with the diagnosis of CIN1, CIN2 and CIN3 in 8, 29, and 26 cases, respectively. The miRNA-21, - 214, -34a, and -200a expression levels in the paraffin-embedded tissue samples were determined. The percentage of patients with a CIN2+ diagnosis at 30-49 years old was significantly different from that of those diagnosed with CIN1. The incidence of CIN2+ patients exposed to passive smoking was significantly different from that of CIN1- patients. The percentage of CIN2+ patients with three pregnancies was significantly different from that of those with CIN1, and the percentage of CIN2+ subjects with >= 4 pregnancies was significantly different from that of CIN1- patients. The number of CIN2+ patients with two or more induced abortions was significantly different from that of patients with CIN1. The percentage of CIN2+ patients who underwent a caesarean section was significantly different from that of patients with CIN. The percentage of CIN2+ patients with first-degree relatives with cancer was significantly different from that of those with CIN1. Among CIN2+ patients, the percentage with a first sexual encounter at <= 20 years old was significantly different from that of those with CIN1. The percentage of CIN2+ patients with >= 2 sexual partners was significantly different from that of CIN1- patients. Results: The plasma miRNA-214, -34a, and -200a expression levels were decreased in patients with more severe cervical lesions. Plasma miRNA levels in CIN1- patients were significantly different from those in CIN2+ patients. The kappa values for miRNA-21, - 214, -34a and -200a in tissue versus plasma were 0.7122, 0.9998, 0.8986 and 0.7458, respectively. The sensitivity of each biomarker for detecting CIN2 was calculated, and ROC curves of the four miRNA biomarkers were drawn. The AUC of the four plasma miRNAs was greater than 0.5, with the AUC of miRNA-21 being the largest at 0.703. The plasma miRNA expression levels exhibited at least one tie between CIN1 and CIN2. The AUCs for miRNA-21, -34a, -200a and - 214 were 0.613, 0.508, 0.615 and 0.505, respectively. Conclusions: Changes in plasma miRNA-21, - 214, -34a and -200a levels were associated with cervical lesion severity. The plasma miRNA levels in CIN1- subjects were significantly different from those in CIN2+ subjects. This analysis may help in detection of high-grade cervical lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available