4.7 Article

A mathematical model of heat transfer during tomato peeling using selected electric infrared emitters

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 106-117

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.001

Keywords

Electric emitters; Emissive power; Infrared heating; Tomato peeling; Two-dimensional model; Heat transfer modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-dimensional mathematical model of heat transfer was developed for heat transfer during the infrared (IR) peeling of tomato. The model was used to predict the temperatures of tomato heated using selected electric IR emitters having different characteristics. The IR heating process was hypothesized as a mathematically gray-diffuse radiation problem based on the enclosure theory. The heat transfer model was solved in COMSOL using a finite element scheme to predict the temperature of tomato during different heating times. The model was validated by comparing the predicted and measured temperatures of tomato surface that were presented in our accompanying study (Vidyarthi et al., 2019). The predicted temperatures agreed well with the experimental data (R-2 > 0.99). Simulation results indicated that IR heating for 25 s induced a dramatic temperature increase (>100 degrees C) on the tomato surface layers; limited to a maximum of 0.66 mm underneath the surface. There was no change in the temperature of tomato center (<28 degrees C). The rapid increase of tomato surface temperature and insignificant rise in interior temperature indicated a meager penetration capacity of IR radiation, causing insubstantial damage to tomato flesh integrity, and consequently preserving the nutritional quality of peeled product. This study provides designing parameters of an efficient IR tomato peeling technology, ensuring a high peeling performance and product quality. (C) 2019 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available