4.8 Article

Plasmonic droplet screen for single-cell secretion analysis

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111639

Keywords

Single cell analysis; Surface plasmon resonance; Multiplex detection; Immunoassay; Platform engineering

Funding

  1. NMRC OFIRG [R-397-000-289-213]
  2. NRF CRP [R-397-000-276-281]
  3. NRF EIRP [R-397-000-252-592]
  4. NRF BDTA [R-397-000-221-592]
  5. MOE Tier-2 [R-397-000-271-112, R-279-000-501-112, R-397-000-253-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-cell secretion analysis technologies are needed to elucidate the heterogeneity of cellular functionalities. Although ligand binding assays in microwells provide a promising approach for measuring single-cell secretions, their throughput is limited. Recently, droplet assays have been developed for high-throughput single-cell screening. However, because washing steps are difficult to perform with droplets, there are still challenges in measuring secretions using droplet assays. In this study, a plasmonic droplet screen approach is developed for one-step washing-free multiplex detection of single-cell secretions. Individual cells are encapsulated with antibody-conjugated gold nanorods (AuNRs) in droplets to evaluate their secretion levels. The shift in the plasmon resonance peak reflects the amount of secreted protein without needing additional indicator and washing steps. The plasmonic signals from a continuous flow of single-cell droplets are collected by dark-field spectroscopy (similar to 100-150 cells min(-1)). This platform is tested by screening interleukin-8 (IL-8) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secreted from suspended leukemia cells and adherent breast cancer cells. Overall, this novel strategy shows the potential and flexibility of high-efficiency multiplex single-cell secretion analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available