4.7 Article

Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108199

Keywords

Evidence-based conservation; Evidence-based policy; Evidence-based practice; Delphi technique; Subject-wide evidence synthesis; Research-implementation space

Funding

  1. A.G. Leventis Foundation
  2. Arcadia
  3. British Ecological Society
  4. Defra
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Joint Nature Conservation Committee
  7. MAVA Foundation
  8. Natural England
  9. Natural Environment Research Council
  10. Nature Conservancy
  11. South West Water
  12. Synchronicity Earth
  13. Waitrose
  14. NERC [NE/N014472/1, NE/N014472/2, NE/K015419/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conservation practitioners, policy-makers and researchers work within shared spaces with many shared goals. Improving the flow of information between conservation researchers, practitioners and policy-makers could lead to dramatic gains in the effectiveness of conservation practice. However, several barriers can hinder this transfer including lack of time, inaccessibility of evidence, the real or perceived irrelevance of scientific research to practical questions, and the politically motivated spread of disinformation. Conservation Evidence works to overcome these barriers by providing a freely-available database of summarized scientific evidence for the effects of conservation interventions on biodiversity. The methods used to build this database - a combination of discipline-wide literature searching and subject-wide evidence synthesis - have been developed over the last 15 years to address the challenges of synthesizing large volumes of evidence of varying quality and measured outcomes. Here, we describe the methods to enhance understanding of the database and how it should be used. We discuss how the database can help to expand multi-directional information transfers between research, practice and policy, which should improve the implementation of evidence-based conservation and, ultimately, achieve better outcomes for biodiversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available