Journal
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 164-174Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1634
Keywords
cellulosic ethanol; cellulase; bioethanol; cost; integrated cellulase; food for fuel
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Previous studies of cellulosic-ethanol production have shown that the cost of producing cellulase is surprisingly significant, and that reducing this cost is key to making cellulosic-ethanol economically viable. This study confirms that finding, and compares the costs of the three approaches for producing cellulase: off-site, on-site, and integrated. It finds that the integrated method is the lowest cost, primarily because it substitutes an inexpensive feedstock, biomass, for a relatively expensive one, glucose. This substitution also makes the ethanol a 100% second-generation biofuel, i.e., it uses no food for fuel'. This study also compares the activity of cellulase produced by the integrated method versus that produced by the off-site method. Laboratory trials of the two show the integrated' cellulase to be better or equal to commercially available off-site' cellulase in converting cellulose to sugar. (c) 2016 The Authors. Biofuels, Bioproducts, Biorefining published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available