4.7 Article

Liquid N2 quenching induced oxygen defects and surface distortion in TiO2 and the effect on the photocatalysis of methylene blue and acetone

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 494, Issue -, Pages 266-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.095

Keywords

TiO2 materials; Photocatalysis; Quenching; Oxygen defects; Surface disorder

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772230, 51461135004]
  2. Hubei Foreign Science and Technology Cooperation Project [2017AHB059]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [L16531]
  4. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory for UV-Emitting Materials and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University [130028908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current research, TiO2 materials pre-annealed at high temperatures were subject to fast super-cold quenching in liquid N-2, with the effect on their structures and photocatalytic properties being studied. Although the liquid N-2 quenching did not change the crystalline structure, morphologies, and specific surface area of TiO2 materials, some local disorders and lattice distortion were caused on the TiO2 surfaces. It has been revealed that the quenching process led to a change in surface structure of anatase that is greater than rutile. Clear experimental proofs showed that more oxygen defects were introduced in anatase than in rutile. It was interesting to see that the quenching induced oxygen defects had different effects on the photocatalysis under aqueous and gaseous conditions. For the aqueous photocatalysis of methylene blue, the oxygen defects led to a decrease in the photocatalysis over anatase, while led to an increase over rutile. By contrast, the acetone gaseous photocatalysis over anatase TiO2 could be increased by similar to 2 times by the quenching induced oxygen defects, and independent on the quenching or not, rutile TiO2 almost inactive to gaseous acetone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available