4.6 Article

Meta-analysis demonstrating that moderate grazing can improve the soil quality across China's grassland ecosystems

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103438

Keywords

Meta-analysis; Soil microbial activity; Dryland; Grazing intensity; Soil nutrient; China's grassland

Categories

Funding

  1. State Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0501802, 2016YFC0502002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871040, 41501057]
  3. Science and Technology Service Network Plan [KFJ-STS-ZDTP-036]
  4. Qinghai Innovation Platform Construction Project [2017-ZJ-Y20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although numerous studies have demonstrated that grazing significantly affects soil nutrients, plant biomass and soil microbial activities in grassland ecosystem, the responses of the relationships of soil nutrients with plant biomass and soil microbial activities to grazing intensities at a large scale are still unknown. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis across China's grasslands to address these questions. Our results suggested that different grazing intensities (low grazing (LG), medium grazing (MG) and high grazing (HG)) were closely related to plant biomass, soil physicochemical properties, soil microbial and enzyme activities. Specifically, MG significantly increased below-ground biomass (BGB). HG apparently decreased soil microbial activities, soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN), while LG showed the opposite results. The grazing-induced changes in plant biomass, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen might be the main underlying drivers that control the responses of SOC and TN to grazing intensities. The findings highlighted that LG was suitable for the sustainable development of China's grasslands and even worldwide dryland management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available