4.6 Review

Cultural monuments and nature conservation: a review of the role of kurgans in the conservation and restoration of steppe vegetation

Journal

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 2473-2490

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1081-2

Keywords

Agro-biodiversity; Barrow; Eurasia; Fragmentation; Grassland restoration; Mound

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland [2P04G04627, NN304081835]
  4. [SROP-4.2.2.B-15/1/KONV-2015-0001]
  5. [OTKA-PD 115627]
  6. [OTKA-K 116639]
  7. [OTKA-PD 111807]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steppe is among the most endangered biomes of the world, especially in Eastern Europe, where more than 90 % of original steppes have been destroyed due to conversion into croplands, afforestation and other human activities. Currently, steppe vegetation is often restricted to places unsuitable for ploughing, such as ancient burial mounds called kurgans. The aim of our study was to collect and synthesise existing knowledge on kurgans by a review of research papers and grey literature. The proportion of kurgans covered by steppe vegetation increases from west to east and from lowlands to uplands. Despite their small size, kurgans act as biodiversity hotspots and harbour many red-listed species. High overall species richness and a high proportion of grassland specialists are maintained by a pronounced fine-scale environmental heterogeneity. The main factors threatening the biodiversity of kurgans are intensified agriculture and construction works. We conclude that kurgans can play a crucial role in preserving steppe vegetation, especially in intensively used agricultural landscapes in the western part of the steppe zone. Despite the vital role of kurgans in sustaining steppe vegetation, we identified serious knowledge gaps on their distribution, vegetation, flora and fauna and their potential role in steppe restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available