4.5 Article

Assessment of expression and specific activities of transglutaminases TG1, TG2, and FXIII-A during osteoclastogenesis

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 591, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.113512

Keywords

Osteoclastogenesis; Transglutaminases

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-119403, PJT-162100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoclasts are large multinucleated bone-resorbing cells derived from monocyte/macrophage lineage. Macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) drive the multi-stage osteoclastogenesis. Transglutaminases (TGs) are Ca2+- and thiol-dependent acyl transferases and protein crosslinking enzymes. TG enzyme family contains eight catalytically active enzymes TG1-7 and Factor XIII-A (FXIII-A). Recent studies have shown that TG1, TG2, and FXIII-A are present in osteoclasts and that TG2 and FXIII-A regulate osteoclastogenesis. In this study, we examined gene and protein expression and specific activities of TG1, TG2, and FXIII-A during osteoclastogenesis using Hitomi peptides in a day-by-day manner. We report that TG activities are highest in the differentiation and early fusion phases and then decrease dramatically. TG activities were upregulated by M-CSF and downregulated by addition of RANKL. FXIII-A was dramatically downregulated by RANKL, suggesting its involvement in M-CSF-mediated precursor commitment phase. TG1 and TG2 proteins were present throughout osteoclastogenesis, suggesting that they may have functions in both differentiation and fusion. In summary, the three TGs likely exert distinct functions at different stages of osteoclastogenesis. Our work also demonstrates that the Hitomi peptides are highly specific tools for detection of distinct TGs in a system where multiple TGs are present.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available