4.7 Article

Raman spectroscopy reveals distinct differences between two closely related bacterial strains, Mycobacterium indicus pranii and Mycobacterium intracellulare

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 411, Issue 30, Pages 7997-8009

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-02197-z

Keywords

Mycobacterium indicus pranii; Mycobacterium intracellulare; Atomic force microscopy; Raman spectroscopy; Resonance Raman spectroscopy; Carotenoids; Mycolic acid

Funding

  1. DST
  2. DBT [BT/PR13522/COE/34/27/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A common technique used to differentiate bacterial species and to determine evolutionary relationships is sequencing their 16S ribosomal RNA genes. However, this method fails when organisms exhibit high similarity in these sequences. Two such strains that have identical 16S rRNA sequences are Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) and Mycobacterium intracellulare. MIP is of significance as it is used as an adjuvant for protection against tuberculosis and leprosy; in addition, it shows potent anti-cancer activity. On the other hand, M. intracellulare is an opportunistic pathogen and causes severe respiratory infections in AIDS patients. It is important to differentiate these two bacterial species as they co-exist in immuno-compromised individuals. To unambiguously distinguish these two closely related bacterial strains, we employed Raman and resonance Raman spectroscopy in conjunction with multivariate statistical tools. Phenotypic profiling for these bacterial species was performed in a kinetic manner. Differences were observed in the mycolic acid profile and carotenoid pigments to show that MIP is biochemically distinct from M. intracellulare. Resonance Raman studies confirmed that carotenoids were produced by both MIP as well as M. intracellulare, though the latter produced higher amounts. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating two closely related mycobacterial strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available