4.7 Article

Chromium speciation using paper-based analytical devices by direct determination and with electromembrane microextraction

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1085, Issue -, Pages 98-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.08.002

Keywords

Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices; Hexavalent chromium; Trivalent chromium; Electromembrane microextraction; Colorimetric detection

Funding

  1. Rachadapisek Sompot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H04675]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we developed and compared three different methods for chromium speciation in water samples using microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (mu PADs). In all methods, detection was based on the complexation reaction of Cr(VI) with diphenylcarbazide on the mu PADs. Cr(III) ions were oxidized to Cr(VI) by Ce(IV) prior to colorimetric detection on the RADs. In the first method, oxidization of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) in the solution containing both trivalent and hexavalent chromium was performed using a batch procedure to obtain total chromium. A dual electromembrane extraction (DEME) technique for simultaneous preconcentration and extraction of chromium species and a single electromembrane extraction (SEME) for preconcentration and extraction of Cr(VI)/total chromium [quantified as Cr(VI) content after oxidation of Cr(III) ions to Cr(VI)] were used in the second and third methods, respectively. The electromembrane extraction was based on the electrokinetic migration of cationic Cr(III) and anionic Cr(VI) toward the cathode and anode, respectively, into the two different hollow fibres. Octanol-1 and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP) in octanol-1 (0.7% v/v) were the most suitable supported liquid membranes for extraction of Cr(VI) and Cr(III), respectively. Among these methods, SEME showed the lowest limits of detection for both analytes. Under optimized conditions, linear calibrations were obtained for Cr(III) from 3 to 30 mu g L-1 and for Cr(VI) from 3 to 70 mu g L-1. The detection limits were 1.0 mu g L-1 and 0.7 mu g L-1 for Cr(III) and Cr(VI), respectively. Our developed method was applied to analyse water samples spiked with different concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) at the parts-per-billion (ppb) level. The statistical evaluation showed that the proposed method agreed well with the validation method, i.e., inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available