4.7 Article

Ratiometric fluorescence system for pH sensing and urea detection based on MoS2 quantum dots and 2, 3-diaminophenazine

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1077, Issue -, Pages 200-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.001

Keywords

Molybdenum disulfide quantum dots; 2, 3-Diaminophenazine; pH sensing; Urea; Ratiometric fluorescence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775052, 21575048]
  2. Science and Technology Development project of Jilin province, China [20180414013GH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we developed a novel and sensitive ratiometric fluorescence strategy for pH sensing and urea detection based on MoS2 quantum dots (MQDs) and 2, 3-diaminophenazine (DAP). The DAP was pH-sensitive and can be used as pH indicator while MQDs was pH-insensitive and acted as a reference fluorescent signal. The fluorescence intensity of DAP at 568 nm exhibited increases gradually while the fluorescence intensity of MQDs at 420 nm kept unchanged as the pH changed from 3.0 to 9.0. So the ratio of the two fluorescence intensities at 568 nm and 420 nm can be used to monitor the change of pH. The pH-sensing system showed a linear and reversible respond to pH in the range of 3.8-6.0 with an interval of 0.2 pH unit. Furthermore, the enzymatic reaction of urea in the presence of urease can lead to the pH increase of the solution, which can be used to detect urea by using the above-mentioned pH-sensing system. There exhibited a good linear relationship between the ratiometric fluorescence intensity of I-568/I-420 and urea concentrations ranging from 5 to 700 mu M. And a low detection limit of 1.8 mu M was obtained. The proposed strategy exhibited excellent selectivity and sensitivity. Additionally, the developed ratiometric fluorescence strategy was successfully applied to detect urea in water samples. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available