4.3 Article

Mosaicism for KCNJ5 Causing Early-Onset Primary Aldosteronism due to Bilateral Adrenocortical Hyperplasia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 124-130

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpz172

Keywords

blood pressure; familial hyperaldosteronism; genetics; hyperaldosteronism; hypertension; KCNJ5; mosaicism; primary aldosteronism

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health & Human Development Division of Intramural Research (DIR
  2. NIH) [Z01-HD008920-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Somatic variants in KCNJ5 are the most common cause of primary aldosteronism (PA). There are few patients with PA in whom the disease is caused by germline variants in the KCNJ5 potassium channel gene (familial hyperaldosteronism type III-FH-III). METHODS A 5-year-old patient who developed hypertension due to bilateral adrenocortical hyperplasia (BAH) causing PA had negative peripheral DNA testing for any known genetic causes of PA. He was treated medically with adequate control of his PA but by the third decade of his life, due to worsening renal function, he underwent bilateral adrenalectomy. RESULTS Focused exome sequencing in multiple nodules of his BAH uncovered a hot-spot pathogenic KCNJ5 variant, while repeated Sanger sequencing showed no detectable DNA defects in peripheral blood and other tissues. However, whole exome, deep sequencing revealed that 0.23% of copies of germline DNA did in fact carry the same KCNJ5 variant that was present in the adrenocortical nodules, suggesting low level germline mosaicism for this PA-causing KCNJ5 defect. CONCLUSIONS Thus, this patient represents a unique case of BAH due to a mosaic KCNJ5 defect. Undoubtedly, his milder PA compared with other known cases of FH-III, was due to his mosaicism. This case has a number of implications for the prognosis, treatment, and counseling of the many patients with PA due to BAH that are seen in hypertension clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available