4.7 Article

Assessment of the appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET in an unselected memory clinic cohort: The ABIDE project

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1458-1467

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.07.003

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid; Positron emission tomography; Appropriate use criteria; Dementia; Clinical practice

Funding

  1. Alzheimer Nederland
  2. Stichting VUmc fonds
  3. ZonMW-Memorabel grant (ABIDE) [733050201]
  4. Stichting Dioraphte
  5. NIHR UCLH biomedical research center
  6. Stichting LSH-TKI (ABIDE) [LSHM16025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid imaging in an unselected cohort. Methods: We calculated sensitivity and specificity of appropriate use (increased confidence and management change), as defined by Amyloid Imaging Taskforce in the AUC, and other clinical utility outcomes. Furthermore, we compared differences in post-positron emission tomography diagnosis and management change between AUC-consistent and AUC-inconsistent patients. Results: Almost half (250/507) of patients were AUC-consistent. In both AUC-consistent and AUC-inconsistent patients, post-positron emission tomography diagnosis (28%-21%) and management (32%-17%) change was substantial. The Amyloid Imaging Taskforce's definition of appropriate use occurred in 55/507 (13%) patients, detected by the AUC with a sensitivity of 93%, and a specificity of 56%. Diagnostic changes occurred independently of AUC status (sensitivity: 57%, specificity: 53%). Discussion: The current AUC are not sufficiently able to discriminate between patients who will benefit from amyloid positron emission tomography and those who will not. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available