4.1 Article

Airborne pollen calendar of Portugal: a 15-year survey (2002-2017)

Journal

ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 194-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.06.012

Keywords

Pollen; Aeroallergens; Pollen calendar; Aerobiology; Portugal

Funding

  1. Portuguese Society of Altergology and Clinical Immunology (SPAIC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Data about the occurrence of airborne pollen enables the creation of pollen calendars with an approximation of flowering periods for the most common allergenic plant species in a specific area. The aim of this work is to provide pollen calendar for each of the seven monitoring regions of Portugal based on 15 years of airborne sampling, in order to chart the seasonal behaviour of the main allergenic pollen types. Material and methods: Airborne pollen monitoring (2002-2017) was carried out by the Portuguese Aerobiotogy Network (RPA), using Hirst-type volumetric spore traps, following well-established guidelines. Results: A total of 14 airborne pollen types were recorded at RPA monitoring stations, of which 64.2% belong to trees, 28.5% to herbs and 7.1% to weeds. The airborne pollen spectrum is dominated by important allergenic pollen types such as Poaceae, Quercus spp., Urticaceae and Cupressaceae. The average pollen index was 42.557 in mainland Portugal and 3.818 in the Islands. There was an increased trend in the airborne pollen levels over the years, namely in Coimbra, Evora and Porto, compared to the remaining regions. Conclusion: This report provides accessible information about the main allergenic airborne pollen types occurring in the course of the year. The pollen calendars charted for each Portuguese region showed that the occurrence of most allergenic taxa was centred from March to July. Pollen peak concentrations were detected earlier in the Centre and Lisbon and Tagus Valley regions, and later in the remaining regions. (C) 2019 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available