4.7 Review

Ghrelin in Alzheimer's disease: Pathologic roles and therapeutic implications

Journal

AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100945

Keywords

Ghrelin; Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid beta; Tau; Mitochondrial deficits; Neuroinflammation

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2018R1D1A3B07041059]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01319901, PJ01428603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ghrelin, which has many important physiological roles, such as stimulating food intake, regulating energy homeostasis, and releasing insulin, has recently been studied for its roles in a diverse range of neurological disorders. Despite the several functions of ghrelin in the central nervous system, whether it works as a therapeutic agent for neurological dysfunction has been unclear. Altered levels and various roles of ghrelin have been reported in Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins resulting in synaptic loss and cognitive decline. Interestingly, treatment with ghrelin or with the agonist of ghrelin receptor showed attenuation in several cases of AD-related pathology. These findings suggest the potential therapeutic implications of ghrelin in the pathogenesis of AD. In the present review, we summarized the roles of ghrelin in AD pathogenesis, amyloid beta (A beta) homeostasis, tau hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial deficit, synaptic dysfunction and cognitive impairment. The findings from this review suggest that ghrelin has a novel therapeutic potential for AD treatment. Thus, rigorously designed studies are needed to establish an effective AD -modifying strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available