4.5 Review

Bioaerosol sampling: Classical approaches, advances, and perspectives

Journal

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 496-519

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950

Keywords

Tiina Reponen

Funding

  1. NIOSH CDC HHS [R01 OH009783] Funding Source: Medline
  2. ACL HHS [R01OH009783] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioaerosol sampling is an essential and integral part of any bioaerosol investigation. Since bioaerosols are very diverse in terms of their sizes, species, biological properties, and requirements for their detection and quantification, bioaerosol sampling is an active, yet challenging research area. This article was inspired by the discussions during the 2018 International Aerosol Conference (IAC) (St. Louis, MO, USA) regarding the need to summarize the current state of the art in bioaerosol research, including bioaerosol sampling, and the need to develop a more standardized set of guidelines for protocols used in bioaerosol research. The article is a combination of literature review and perspectives: it discusses the main bioaerosol sampling techniques and then overviews the latest technical developments in each area; the overview is followed by the discussion of the emerging trends and developments in the field, including personal sampling, application of passive samplers, and advances toward improving bioaerosol detection limits as well as the emerging challenges such as collection of viruses and collection of unbiased samples for bioaerosol sequencing. The article also discusses some of the practical aspects of bioaerosol sampling with particular focus on sampling aspects that could lead to bioaerosol determination bias. The article concludes by suggesting several goals for bioaerosol sampling and development community to work toward and describes some of the grand bioaerosol challenges discussed at the IAC 2018.Copyright (c) 2020 American Association for Aerosol Research

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available