4.8 Article

Design Strategies to Enable the Efficient Use of Sodium Metal Anodes in High-Energy Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201903891

Keywords

artificial solid electrolyte interphases; dendrite growth; electrode engineering; electrolyte engineering; sodium metal anodes

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE180100036]
  2. ARC [DP160104340, DP170100436, DP180102297]
  3. BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) [03XP0047D, 03XP0110A]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE180100036] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium-based batteries have attracted considerable attention and are recognized as ideal candidates for large-scale and low-cost energy storage. Sodium (Na) metal anodes are considered as one of the most promising anodes for next-generation, high-energy, Na-based batteries owing to their high theoretical specific capacity (1166 mA h g(-1)) and low standard electrode potential. Herein, an overview of the recent developments in Na metal anodes for high-energy batteries is provided. The high reactivity and large volume expansion of Na metal anodes during charge and discharge make the electrode/electrolyte interphase unstable, leading to the formation of Na dendrites, short cycle life, and safety issues. Design strategies to enable the efficient use of Na metal anodes are elucidated, including liquid electrolyte engineering, electrode/electrolyte interface optimization, sophisticated electrode construction, and solid electrolyte engineering. Finally, the remaining challenges and future research directions are identified. It is hoped that this progress report will shape a consistent view of this field and provide inspiration for future research to improve Na metal anodes and enable the development of high-energy sodium batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available