4.8 Article

Redox Tuning in Crystalline and Electronic Structure of Bimetal-Organic Frameworks Derived Cobalt/Nickel Boride/Sulfide for Boosted Faradaic Capacitance

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 51, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201905744

Keywords

electronic tuning; energy storage; faradaic capacitance; metal-organic frameworks; redox strategies

Funding

  1. National 1000 Young Talents Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21805103, 21805104]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018KFYXKJC044, 2018KFYYXJJ121, 2017KFXKJC002, 2017KFYXJJ164]
  4. Opening Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure [2019MCF02]
  5. Center for Nanoscale Characterization AMP
  6. Devices (CNCD), WNLO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of efficient electrode materials is a cutting-edge approach for high-performance energy storage devices. Herein, an effective chemical redox approach is reported for tuning the crystalline and electronic structures of bimetallic cobalt/nickel-organic frameworks (Co-Ni MOFs) to boost faradaic redox reaction for high energy density. The as-obtained cobalt/nickel boride/sulfide exhibits a high specific capacitance (1281 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)), remarkable rate performance (802.9 F g(-1) at 20 A g(-1)), and outstanding cycling stability (92.1% retention after 10 000 cycles). An energy storage device fabricated with a cobalt/nickel boride/sulfide electrode exhibits a high energy density of 50.0 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 857.7 W kg(-1), and capacity retention of 87.7% (up to 5000 cycles at 12 A g(-1)). Such an effective redox approach realizes the systematic electronic tuning that activates the fast faradaic reactions of the metal species in cobalt/nickel boride/sulfide which may shed substantial light on inspiring MOFs and their derivatives for energy storage devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available