4.8 Article

Mixed-Metal-Cluster Strategy for Boosting Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Robust Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 48, Pages 45080-45086

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b14995

Keywords

mixed-metal-cluster; oxygen evolution reaction; PCN-Fe2Co-Fe2Ni; metal sites; metal-organic frameworks

Funding

  1. NSFC [21676066]
  2. Special Fund for Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents of Harbin Science and Technology Bureau [2017RAQXJ057]
  3. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education Open Project Fund [FIM2017012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rational construction of mixed metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has been proved to be an effective way to heighten the electrocatalytic performance for MOFs, while the function of mixed metal clusters in MOFs to the electrocatalytic activity has not been known. For the first time, we present a mixed-metal-cluster strategy to boost electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance for MOFs. Heterometal clusters (Fe2M(mu 3-O) (CH3COO)(6)(H2O)(3), denoted as Fe2M (M: Co or Ni)), were chosen as the metal source to construct two bimetal PCN-250-Fe2M. Then, we further mixed Fe2Co and Fe2Ni clusters to construct mixed-metal-cluster PCN-Fe2Co-Fe2Ni by the in situ solvothermal reaction. Consequently, the OER activity of PCN-Fe2Co-Fe2Ni shows a dramatic enhancement compared with that of the parent bimetal MOFs. The PCN-Fe2Co-Fe-2 Ni displays a lower overpotential of 271 mV (eta(10)), small Tafel slope (67.7 mV dec(-1)), and good linear sweep voltammetry cycle stability for the OER. Combination of DFT calculation and experiment results show that the improved electrocatalytic activity of PCN-Fe2Co-Fe-2 Ni is ascribed to the increased electron density of Co and Ni active centers and electrochemically active areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available